Shear v. Brinkman
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Ohiolcasaw District Court — HoN. L. O. ELatoh, Jtidge. Aotion to restrain a nuisance, caused by selling and keeping for sale in a certain building intoxicating liquors. A temporary injunction was asked, which was refused, and the petition dismissed, and the plaintiff 'appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtSeevers, J.
It sufficiently appears that the building in which it is claimed intoxicating liquors were sold and kept for sale, thereby causing a nuisance, which it is sought in this action to enjoin, belonged to Josephine Sieh, and it was leased to the defendant Brinkman, who at one time sold intoxicating liquors therein. Mrs. Sieh, being informed *699that intoxicating liquors were being sold in the building, caused Brinkman to be notified that he must not sell any liquors in such building, and he ceased to do so prior to the service on him of the notice of the pendency of this action. Certain new leases…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Judge v. KribsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1887
- Loomis v. McKenzieSupreme Court of Iowa · 1878
3Cited by10 opinions
- Black v. State ex rel. District Attorney-GeneralTennessee Supreme Court · 1914
- Perry v. Howe Co-operative Creamery Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1904
- Sharp v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899
- State v. FrahmSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899
- Lowery v. LowerySupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.