Legal Opinion
United States v. Maxi Switch, Inc.
United States Court of International Trade
Decided August 4, 1998No. Slip. Op. 98-111. Court No. 97-08-01426PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
POGUE, Judge.
The United States Customs Service (“Customs”) commenced this action against Defendant, Maxi Switch, Inc. (“MSI”), to recover civil penalties for violation of section 592 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. § 1592 (1988), alleging grossly negligent conduct concerning the importation of certain video game cartridges. This Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1582(1) (1994).
Defendant’s motion to dismiss is before the Court. Defendant alleges that (1) Customs denied MSI administrative due process and (2) Customs failed to exhaust administrative remedies.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Gould, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Nickey v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- United States v. Priority Products, Inc., and Walter L. And Rosalie E. HussCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- Sea-Land Service, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Jac Natori Co.United States Court of International Trade · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Shandong Huarong MacHinery Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
- United States v. Aegis Security InsuranceUnited States Court of International Trade · 2005
- United States v. Nitek Elecs., Inc.United States Court of International Trade · 2012
- United States v. Optrex America, Inc.United States Court of International Trade · 2005