United States v. Optrex America, Inc.
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
BARZILAY, Judge:
In this 19 U.S.C. § 1592 penalty action, Plaintiff, the United States Bureau of Customs and Border Protection (“Customs” or “government”), moved for leave to amend its complaint pursuant to USCIT Rule 15(a). Plaintiff seeks to add two additional claims against Defendant, Optrex America, Inc. (“Optrex”). Specifically, the government wants to charge Optrex with higher levels of culpability than initially claimed - gross negligence and fraud. In connection with these new claims, the government also seeks to add new entries. For the reasons outlined…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Things Remembered, Inc. v. PetrarcaSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Dole Food Co. v. PatricksonSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Shoshone Indian Tribe of the Wind River Reservation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Priority Products, Inc., and Walter L. And Rosalie E. HussCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- Jerry L. Weddel, and Wife Lea Ann Weddel, on Behalf of Their Minor Daughter, Cassie Ann Weddel v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.