Legal Opinion

Chicago Sash, Door & Blind Manufacturing Co. v. Haven

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 1902PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from the Appellate Court for the First District;—heard in that court on appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Farltn Q. Ball, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cartwright

This is an action of debt, brought by appellant against appellee, in the superior court of Cook county, on a bond executed by Frederick B. Stowell and Louis D. Beman, partners under the firm name of F. B. Stowell & Co., and by the defendant, in the sum of $4950, payable to the plaintiff, the condition whereof is as follows: “The condition of this obligation is such, that if, whereas, the said Chicago Sash, Door and Blind Manufacturing Company, as sub-contractors, by a contract with said F. B. Stowell & Co., contractors, dated December 4, 1896, agreed to furnish all materials required to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Gage v. LewisIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Taylor v. BeckIllinois Supreme Court · 1851
  3. Hawk v. Chicago, Burlington & Northern RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Turner v. Peoria & Springfield RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1880
  5. King v. RamsayIllinois Supreme Court · 1852

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Globe Indemnity Co. v. KesnerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1917
  2. Killean v. BeaupreAppellate Court of Illinois · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API