King v. Ramsay
Illinois Supreme Court
The facts of this case are stated in the opinion of the court. The cause was heard before T. L. Dickey, Judge, without a jury, at April term, 1850, of the Marshall Circuit Court. • Judgment for Ramsay on the bond, for eight hundred dollars. The defendants in the court below excepted to the finding of the court, and sued out this writ of error.
1Opinion of the CourtTreat, C. J.
This was an action of debt, brought in the name of Ramsay, sheriff of Marshall county, against Burnell, King, Yonts, Earl, and Vinecore. King, Earl, and Vinecore ■ only were served with process. The declaration was upon a replevin-bond, executed by the defendants to the plaintiff, on the 8th of March, 1847, in the penalty of ¡$800, conditioned for the return, if return should be awarded, of eight horses and eight harnesses, which had been taken by the plaintiff in an action of replevin, instituted by Burnell and others against Robertson; and it alleged a trial of the action of replevin, a…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Wallace v. ClarkIndiana Supreme Court · 1844
3Cited by10 opinions
- Kilgour v. Drainage CommissionersIllinois Supreme Court · 1884
- D'Arcy v. SteuerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
- Dickinson v. LovellSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1857
- Chicago Sash, Door & Blind Manufacturing Co. v. HavenIllinois Supreme Court · 1902
- Magerstadt v. HarderAppellate Court of Illinois · 1901
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.