Legal Opinion

Globe Indemnity Co. v. Kesner

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 9, 1917No. Gen. No. 21,870PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Charles A. Williams, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1915. Certiorari denied by Supreme Court (making opinion final).

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Justice Barnes

delivered the opinion of the court.

This action is founded on an indemnifying bond whereby appellant bound himself to pay appellee the sum of $15,500 on certain conditions therein named. In that form it has all the characteristics of a bond. (Chicago Sash Door & Blind, Mfg. Co. v. Haven, 195 Ill. 474.)

Following the paragraph containing the formal obligation the instrument reads:

“The condition of the aforegoing obligation is such, that whereas, at the special instance and request of said obligors and on the security hereof, the company has executed, or agreed to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Mix v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Arnott v. FrielIllinois Supreme Court · 1869
  3. Freeman v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1870
  4. George J. Cooke Co. v. BurkeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1909
  5. Chicago Sash, Door & Blind Manufacturing Co. v. HavenIllinois Supreme Court · 1902

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bryson v. FischerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API