Legal Opinion

Gibson v. Hills

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided November 26, 1928No. 12,129PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Adams

Hills, one of the defendants in error, and executor of the will of Harriet Sargent Hauser, deceased, filed a petition in the county court to construe such will. Jessie Ocker Gibson and Edna M. Ocker Stevenson, plaintiffs in error, answered, and claimed certain specific legacies, which the court allowed. They claimed also the entire residuary estate, which was disallowed. They bring the case here for review and ask for a supersedeas. The question of the right to the residuary estate is all that is before us. Various heirs of deceased are co-defendants in error with Hills.

The substance of Mrs.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Mulcahy v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1927
  2. Bryan v. BigelowSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1905
  3. Engelthaler v. EngelthalerIllinois Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Hignett v. ShermanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1924
  5. Haggin v. International Trust Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1917

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Pitman v. Colorado National BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1945
  2. In Re Estate of DewsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1973
  3. Matter of Estate of PalizziSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
  4. Downing v. SmithSupreme Court of Colorado · 1973
  5. Downing v. SmithSupreme Court of Colorado · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API