Legal Opinion

Hignett v. Sherman

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided March 3, 1924No. 10,628PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Campbell

1. John S. Hart died testate. When his will was made, and also at the time of his death, his sole heirs at law were his five children, three sons, Andrew, Nathaniel' and Charles, and two married daughters, Mary Riddle and Gertrude Hignett. The will, after providing in the first clause or item for the payment of claims'against the estate, in clauses or items 2, 3, 4, and 5, contains specific bequests of $1.00 to each of the three sons and to Mrs. Riddle, and the ones relating to Charles and Mrs. Riddle release and cancel the debts they owe their father. In the 6th clause the residuary estate,…

2Cases cited55 opinions

  1. McArthur v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. Baer v. HendricksNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  3. In Re the Accounting of CraneNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
  4. Rudd v. . CornellNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
  5. Smith v. . EdwardsNew York Court of Appeals · 1882

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Pitman v. Colorado National BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1945
  2. Smith v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1957
  3. Hickey v. CostelloSupreme Court of Colorado · 1927
  4. Jones v. Pueblo Savings & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1939
  5. Question Submitted by the U.S Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit v. United Banks of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1976

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API