Legal Opinion

Ryobi Die Casting v. Montgomery

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 3, 1999No. 73A05-9805-CV-278PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROBB, Judge.

Case Summary 1

Appellant-Defendant, Ryobi Die Casting (USA), Inc. (“Ryobi”), appeals the trial court’s denial of its motion for summary judgment on a negligence claim brought by Appellees-Plaintiffs, Scott and Michelle Montgomery (“Montgomery”), after Scott was injured while working on Ryobi’s premises. We reverse.

Issues

Ryobi raises two issues for our review which we restate as:

1. Whether Ryobi is entitled to summary judgment because it did not have a non-delegable duty to Montgomery, an employee of an independent contractor, there being no “peculiar risk” involved and the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Prest-O-Lite Co. v. SkeelIndiana Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Orr v. Westminster Village North, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Bagley v. Insight Communications Co., LPIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Cummings v. Hoosier Marine Properties, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. Robinson v. KinnickIndiana Court of Appeals · 1989

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Shaffer v. Acme Limestone Co., Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Merrill v. Knauf Fiber Glass GmbHIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. Stumpf v. Hagerman Construction Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. Walker v. MartinIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. Ling v. StillwellIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API