Hughes Bros. Mfg. Co. v. Cicero Trust & Savings Bank
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
FOSTER, Circuit Judge.
Defendant in error, hereafter called plaintiff, brought suit as' holder- of a trade acceptance in the form of a promissory note dated at Dallas, Tex., December 9, 1925, payable 60 days after date, to the order of Four C Company, of Cicero, "HI., for $3,750, and signed and indorsed, “Accepted” by plaintiff in error, hereafter called defendant. At the close of the evidence both sides moved for a directed verdict. The motion of plaintiff was granted, and that of defendant was overruled. Error is assigned to this action of the court.
In defense of the claim defendant set up…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- York Manufacturing Co. v. ColleySupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Washer v. SmyerTexas Supreme Court · 1919
- Tilden v. BlairSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Farmers' Nat. Bank v. Sutton Manuf'g Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1892
- Lauter v. Jarvis-Conklin Mortgage Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1897
3Cited by3 opinions
- Colby v. Bank of DouglasArizona Supreme Court · 1962
- Akbar v. BlinkenDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2023
- Peterbilt-Southern Sales, Inc. v. Pacific Car and Foundry CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963