Akbar v. Blinken
District Court, S.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ATIEH AKBAR, et al., Case No.: 23cv1054-LL-BLM 12 Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S 13 v. MOTION TO DISMISS 14 ANTONY J. BLINKEN, U.S. Secretary of [ECF No. 4] State, 15 Defendant. 16 17 18 Before the Court is Defendant Antony J. Blinken's (“Defendant”) Motion to Dismiss 19 Plaintiffs Atieh Akbar and Mohammadreza Akbar’s (collectively “Plaintiffs”) Complaint. 20 ECF No. 4, Motion to Dismiss (“Motion” or “Mot.”). Defendant’s Motion has been fully 21 briefed, and the Court deems it suitable for submission…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Navarro v. BlockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Watters v. Wachovia Bank, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Safe Air for Everyone v. MeyerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.