Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Winn-Dixie Montgomery, LLC v. Purser

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided April 4, 2014No. 2120701Published

1ConcurrenceMoore, Judge

On original submission, I believed that the fact that the record omits a transcript of the trial proceedings occurring on December 13, 2012, precluded our review of the issues raised by Winn-Dixie Montgomery, LLC (“the employer”). Upon further consideration, I am no longer completely convinced of my original conclusion, because I believe some of the issues are renewable.

Originally, the Aabama Workmen’s Compensation Act (“the original Act”) allowed only for certiorari review. See Aa. Acts 1919, Act. No. 45, § 21. Certiorari review allowed only for review of legal errors apparent on the face of…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Bruno v. Harbert Intern. Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1992
  2. Ex Parte Trinity Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1996
  3. Madden's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  4. Greek v. Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  5. Ex Parte PriceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API