Winn-Dixie Montgomery, LLC v. Purser
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
1ConcurrenceMoore, Judge
On original submission, I believed that the fact that the record omits a transcript of the trial proceedings occurring on December 13, 2012, precluded our review of the issues raised by Winn-Dixie Montgomery, LLC (“the employer”). Upon further consideration, I am no longer completely convinced of my original conclusion, because I believe some of the issues are renewable.
Originally, the Aabama Workmen’s Compensation Act (“the original Act”) allowed only for certiorari review. See Aa. Acts 1919, Act. No. 45, § 21. Certiorari review allowed only for review of legal errors apparent on the face of…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Bruno v. Harbert Intern. Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1992
- Ex Parte Trinity Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1996
- Madden's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
- Greek v. Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1922
- Ex Parte PriceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.