Legal Opinion

McCormick v. Halliburton Co.

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Decided September 10, 2012No. Case Nos. CIV-11-1272-M, CIV-11-1305-M, CIV-11-1307-M, CIV-11-1322-M, CIV-11-1343-MPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

VICKI MILES-LaGRANGE, Chief Judge.

Defendants in the above-referenced cases have filed motions for judgment on the pleadings as to plaintiffs’ request for medical monitoring relief. This matter has been fully briefed. Based upon the parties’ submissions, the Court makes its determination.

I. Background

Plaintiffs in the above-referenced cases have sued defendants based upon their operations at a facility on Osage Road in Duncan, Oklahoma (the “Site”). The Site was used to conduct various research and development activities, including cleaning U.S. Department of Defense missile motor casings…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Pino v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
  3. Rivas v. Parkland ManorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
  4. City of Bethany v. Public Employees Relations BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  5. Muskogee Electric Traction Co. v. ReedSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Meier v. Chesapeake Operating L.L.C.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2018
  2. Earles v. ClevelandDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2019
  3. Meier v. Chesapeake OperatingCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
  4. Rhoades v. StittDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API