Legal Opinion

Pino v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided October 29, 2007No. 06-7108PublishedCited by 100 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CERTIFICATION OF QUESTION OF STATE LAW

NEIL M. GORSUCH, Circuit Judge.

Michael and Amy Pino ask this court to certify to the Oklahoma Supreme Court the question whether a cause of action existed for the wrongful death of a nonviable stillborn fetus as of September 1-2, 2003. We agree that the resolution of this question may well determine the outcome of the Pinos’ suit, and that it is a novel and unsettled matter in Oklahoma law. Accordingly, and as specified below, we grant the motion to certify.

I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND

Some twenty weeks pregnant, Ms. Pino arrived at the Carl Albert Indian Health…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Arizonans for Official English v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Lehman Brothers v. ScheinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Samman v. Multiple Injury Trust FundSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
  4. Nealis v. BairdSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
  5. Graham v. KeuchelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by100 opinions

  1. Colony Insurance Co. v. BurkeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
  2. Valley Forge Insurance v. Health Care Management Partners, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
  3. Pennington v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
  4. Wilson v. WorkmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
  5. Cornhusker Casualty Company v. SkajCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015

95 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API