Legal Opinion

State v. Swift

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1880PublishedCited by 49 opinions

From tbe Floyd Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBiddle, C. J.

The appellee, on the 12th day of May, 1880, was indicted as an inspector of an election, for refusing to receive the vote of an elector.

The indictment charges, that on the 4th day of May, 1880, in the city of New Albany, an election was held for the purpose of electing a common councilman, at the voting precinct of the sixth ward in said city; that the appellee was duly appointed an inspector af said election, and acted as such; that one James Y. Kelso, who was then and there a legal and qualified voter of said precinct, and entitled to vote at said election, offered his vote at said…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Taylor v. TaylorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1865
  2. Collier v. FriersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1854
  3. People ex rel. Wheaton v. WiantIllinois Supreme Court · 1868
  4. Gillespie v. PalmerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1866
  5. State v. WinkelmeierSupreme Court of Missouri · 1864

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Kadderly v. PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Ellingham v. DyeIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Prince v. CrockerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1896
  4. Gottstein v. ListerWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Gabbert v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1902

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API