Legal Opinion
Brennen v. Mogul Corp.
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided October 14, 1988No. 85-396PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Martin, Supr. J.,
Specially Assigned. Plaintiff, Joseph F. Brennen, brought an action against defendant, The Mogul Corporation, to recover compensatory and punitive damages. His wife, Kari Brennen, sought recovery for loss of consortium. Brennen, a former plumbing tradesman employed by the University of Vermont, claimed he contracted Legionnaire’s Disease and suffered personal injuries as a result of the failure of certain chemicals and water treatment equipment manufactured by defendant to prevent the growth of legionella bacteria in a cooling tower water system located on the University of…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Hay v. Medical Center Hosp. of VermontSupreme Court of Vermont · 1985
- Zaleskie v. JoyceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1975
- Carvalho v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- State v. BradleySupreme Court of Vermont · 1894
- Cliche v. FairSupreme Court of Vermont · 1984
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Kathy L. Lavoie, Formerly Known as Kathy L. Labelle v. Pacific Press & Shear Company, a Division of Canron Corp., and Canron Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- McCoy v. Colonial Baking Co. Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1990
- Hardwick-Morrison Co. v. AlbertssonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1992
- Farrell v. Vermont Electric Power Co., and Vermont Transco, LLCSupreme Court of Vermont · 2012
- Callan v. HackettSupreme Court of Vermont · 2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.