Legal Opinion

Carvalho v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 11, 1986No. 85-1711PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL, Circuit Judge:

Plaintiff-appellant Moana Carvalho (plaintiff or Carvalho), appeals from the decision of the district court finding her cause of action barred by Hawaii’s two-year statute of limitations for tort claims, Hawaii Rev.Stat. § 657-7. We vacate the decision of the district court and remand for a new trial on the statute of limitations issue.

*455I

Plaintiff, acting as administratrix of her husband’s estate, filed this action against defendant-appellee Raybestos-Manhattan (Raybestos) and other producers and distributors of asbestos-related products on July 28, 1980,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Coursen v. A.H. Robins Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  2. Lewis v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Turner v. WillisHawaii Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Yamaguchi v. Queen's Medical CenterHawaii Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Schumann v. McGinnSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Childs v. HausseckerTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  2. In Re Air Crash Disaster.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
  3. Winston B. Lewy v. Southern Pacific Transportation CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  4. In Re Aircrash In Bali, Indonesia.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  5. Patricia Johnson v. Teamsters Local 559, Patricia Johnson v. Teamsters Local 559Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API