Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Bishop

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 27, 1993PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed March 13, 1992, which, inter alia, ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.

Claimant resigned from her employment as a typist because she did not want to do receptionist work for the employer. According to claimant, she was becoming ill as a result of her "combined duties and responsibilities”. The employer’s representative testified, however, that claimant was assigned to do receptionist work only as a backup while…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of RubinsteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1970
  2. In re the Claim of BarberAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  3. In re the Claim of WilenskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969
  4. In re the Claim of KlausnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1967

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of RobinsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  2. In re the Claim of LevinnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  3. In re the Claim of TargettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API