Salim v. Dahlberg
District Court, E.D. Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Leonie M. Brinkema, United States District Judge
Before the Court is the Defendant’s Rule 59 Motion, in which he argues that he should be granted a new trial because the court lacked jurisdiction to hear and decide this civil action. Defendant argues in the alternative that even if the court had jurisdiction over the action, it erred in exercising its discretion to maintain supplemental jurisdiction over the state law claims after the single federal claim was dismissed.1 Defendant also argues that the *900amount of damages awarded by the jury is against the weight of the…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. Nexus Services, Inc.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 2022
- Cross v. BinnsDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2024
- Miller v. Montgomery County Public SchoolsDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2020
- Scratch Golf LLC v. Beaufort CountyDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2021
- Technibilt, Ltd. v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of North CarolinaDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2021