Legal Opinion

Southeast Arkansas Hospice, Inc. v. Sebelius

District Court, E.D. Arkansas

Decided February 20, 2014No. 2:13-cv-00134-KGBPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

KRISTINE G. BAKER, District Judge.

Plaintiff Southeast Arkansas Hospice, Inc. (“SEARK”) brings this action against Kathleen Sebelius, the Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”), alleging that the Secretary’s regulation purportedly prohibiting SEARK from discharging hospice patients who exhaust their hospice benefits operates as a regulatory taking and that the provider agreement is an unconscionable contract of adhesion, requiring SEARK to continue to serve hospice patients even after their benefit period has ended while making no…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Dataphase Systems, Inc. v. C L Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
  3. Sampson v. MurraySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Heckler v. RingerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Doran v. Salem Inn, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Tuohey ex rel. Bryant v. Chenal Healthcare, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2016
  2. Daniel Tellez Fuga v. Warden, et al.District Court, E.D. California · 2026
  3. Padda v. BecerraDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2021
  4. Padda v. BecerraDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API