Legal Opinion

Daniel Tellez Fuga v. Warden, et al.

District Court, E.D. California

Decided April 8, 2026No. 2:26-cv-00654Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 DANIEL TELLEZ FUGA, Case No. 2:26-cv-00654-JLT-SAB-HC 11 Petitioner, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION TO DENY RESPONDENTS’ MOTION TO 12 v. DISMISS, GRANT PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS, AND DIRECT 13 WARDEN, et al., RESPONDENTS TO PROVIDE PETITIONER WITH A BOND HEARING 14 Respondents. (ECF Nos. 1, 6) 15 16 Petitioner is an immigration detainee proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas 17 corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. 18 I. 19 BACKGROUND 20 Petitioner is a citizen of Mexico who entered the United…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. J. Wilkerson v. B. WheelerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  2. Jennings v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
  3. Prieto-Romero v. ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  4. United States v. EvansCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019
  5. Southeast Arkansas Hospice, Inc. v. SebeliusDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API