Commonwealth v. Arriaga
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
BECK, Judge:
Appellant raises a constitutional challenge to a sentencing provision for violation of the Controlled Substance, Drug, Device and Cosmetic Act which provides for heightened penalties for repeat offenders. See 18 Pa.C.S.A. § 7508(a)(3)(i). We find the provision constitutional and therefore affirm the judgment of sentence.
This is an appeal from a judgment of sentence imposed for delivery of a controlled substance (cocaine) and criminal conspiracy. The facts underlying appellant’s arrest and trial are irrelevant to this appeal as appellant’s sole issue is the constitutionality of the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Rummel v. EstelleSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Spencer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Gryger v. BurkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- McDonald v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Commonwealth v. QuinlanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Commonwealth v. FultonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Commonwealth v. TustinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Commonwealth v. DasilvaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Commonwealth v. QuinlanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.