Macarz v. Transworld Systems, Inc.
District Court, D. Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION [DOC. # 49]
ARTERTON, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Previously in this case, the Court ruled that the defendant’s collection letter violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”), 15 U.S.C. § 1692 et seq. Plaintiff Jeffrey Macarz now moves to certify the case as a class action. Defendant Trans-world opposes class certification, primarily on grounds that Mr. Macarz is neither typical nor a fair representative of the interests of the class, and that the class action vehicle is improper in the circumstances of this case. For the reasons that…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Mace v. Van Ru Credit Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- Savino v. Computer Credit, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Claire Rand, Custodian for Brett Rand v. Monsanto CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- Dura-Bilt Corp. v. Chase Manhattan Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1981
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Agan v. Katzman & Korr, P.A.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2004
- Anderson Living Trust v. WPX Energy Production, LLCDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2015
- Butto v. Collecto Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2013
- Annunziato v. Collecto, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2013
- Bustillos v. Board of County CommissionersDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2016
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.