Legal Opinion

Kemp v. Sutton

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1925No. Docket No. 69PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiest, J.

The bill herein was filed to obtain construction of the will of George Kemp, deceased. Plaintiff claims he is one of the devisees of the personal property and entitled as such to a distributive share of the estate. The sons of the testator insist they are the sole surviving devisees, and, by answer in the nature of a cross-bill, assert the devise of real estate to the city of Sault Ste. Marie, subject to a life estate, is void because power of alienation is suspended beyond two lives in being, and, therefore, they take as heirs at law. This brought the city to court with the claim that the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In re Shumway's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Rood v. HoveyMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Porter v. PorterMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Cover v. JamesIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
  5. In Re Patterson's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1924

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Dodge v. Detroit Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Taylor v. TaylorMichigan Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Hennigh v. HennighMontana Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Smith v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Old Kent Bank & Trust Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1966

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API