Legal Opinion

Porter v. Porter

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 25, 1883PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Error to "Wayne. (Chambers, J.) Ejectment. Defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

The controversy in this case is between the widow of a son of George E. Porter deceased, (who died between the decease of his father and of his mother the widow of George E. Porter, who had a life interest in her husband’s estate,) and the surviving children of George E. Porter. The question is whether the estate given by George E. Porter by will to his children was vested or contingent on their outliving their mother. The will, after giving Mrs. Eliza G. Porter an estate for life in the entire property of the testator, contained the following residuary clause:

“ On the decease of my wife,…

2Cited by18 opinions

  1. Union Mutual Ass'n v. MontgomeryMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Rivenett v. BourquinMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Hay v. HayMichigan Supreme Court · 1947
  4. In Re Jamieson EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
  5. In Re Churchill's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1925

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API