Legal Opinion

Long v. Grill

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided October 23, 2003No. 02AP-1373 (ACCELERATED CALENDAR)PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant, Robert O. Long, appeals from the November 18, 2002 decision and judgment entry of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas sustaining a motion to dismiss by defendants-appellees, Simon Grill and B.V.P. Design, Inc. (“BVP”), for lack of in personam jurisdiction over defendants. Plaintiff assigns a single error:

“The trial court erred as a matter of law in sustaining defendant-appellee’s motion to dismiss.”

{¶ 2} Because the trial court had an adequate basis upon which to properly assert in personam jurisdiction over defendants, we reverse the trial court’s judgment…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Shaffer v. HeitnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Goldstein v. ChristiansenOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Kentucky Oaks Mall Co. v. Mitchell's Formal Wear, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1990

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Barnabas Consulting Ltd. v. Riverside Health Sys., 07ap-1014 (6-30-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. Developers Diversified Realty v. Coventry Real Estate Fund II, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2012
  3. Stradiot Specialty v. American Calendar Co., 2004-L-162 (6-29-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. Mouded v. Khoury, Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eighth District, Cuyahoga County2018
  5. Priconics, L.L.C. v. Amperor, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2018

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API