Legal Opinion
Kentucky Oaks Mall Co. v. Mitchell's Formal Wear, Inc.
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided August 8, 1990No. 89-1337PublishedCited by 174 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.
Pursuant to Civ. R. 12(B)(2), Mitchell’s moved to dismiss appellant’s complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction. The trial court, on that basis, dismissed the complaint and the court of appeals affirmed. Thus, we must first decide whether Mitchell’s conduct falls within Ohio’s “long-arm statute” or applicable civil rule, and if the statute or civil rule confers personal jurisdiction, then we must determine whether granting jurisdiction comports with the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. See Fallang v. Hickey (1988), 40 Ohio St. 3d 106, 532…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- SD Leasing, Inc. v. Al Spain and Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by174 opinions
- The Akro Corporation v. Ken LukerCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Goldstein v. ChristiansenOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- U.S. Sprint Communications Co. Ltd. Partnership v. Mr. K's Foods, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1994
- The Kroger Company v. Malease Foods Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- Clark v. ConnorOhio Supreme Court · 1998
169 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.