Legal Opinion

Pinson v. Bentley

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided October 17, 1944PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Chiep Justice Cammack

Affirming in part, reversing in part.

Reference to the cases of Pinson et al. v. Williams, 288 Ky. 314, 155 S. W. 2d 869, and Pinson et al. v. Bentley et al., 293 Ky. 490, 169 S. W. 2d 305, 306, will furnish the background of the present controversy between the parties. In the first case we held the sale of the Pin-sons’ respective equities of redemption was void. In the second case we held the Pinsons deposited their redemption money with the clerk of the Pike Circuit Court within the extension of time allowed them by the purchaser (December…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Forst v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1897
  2. Townsend v. TiptonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1942
  3. George Hogg & Son v. BudnickCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
  4. Pinson v. BentleyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1943
  5. Pinson v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1941

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Young v. AuxierCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1946
  2. Varnell v. LeeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API