Young v. Auxier
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion op the Court by
Morris, Commissioner
Affirming.
The 'matter .presented is an outgrowth of litigation which resulted in three former appeals. Pinson v. Williams, 288 Ky. 314, 155 S. W. 2d 869; Pinson v. Bentley, 293 Ky. 490, 169 S. W. 2d 305; 298 Ky. 396, 182 S. W. 2d 974. The reader is referred to them for a history of the litigation which begdn as far back as 1935. We shall only state the situation and status of parties following our last opinion.
That appeal involved the disbursement of funds remaining of the deposit by Bentley and Johnson, purchasers of William’s right of redemption of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Newby & Taylor v. Hill & MillionCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1859
- Cheatham v. HeadCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924
- Birkhead v. RingoCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. WilhoitCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938
- Pinson v. BentleyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1943
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Brooks v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1967
- J.P. Morgan Delaware v. Onyx Arabians II, Ltd.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1993