Legal Opinion

Schmidt v. Pelz

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 20, 1939No. 27208. En BancPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlake, C. J.

While engaged in cleaning gutters on defendants’ house, plaintiff fell from the roof and sustained injuries for which he seeks damages in this action. From judgment entered on a verdict in his favor, defendants appeal.

Of several assignments of error, we shall discuss the following: (1) Challenging the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the verdict; (2) the denial of a requested instruction.

First: Respondent’s cause of action is predicated upon the inadequacy of a rope furnished by appellants for his use in connection with the work.

According to the allegations of respondent’s complaint and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Brown v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1906

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Richardson v. Pacific Power & Light Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1941
  2. State v. BixbyWashington Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Rowe v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Tabert v. ZierWashington Supreme Court · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API