Legal Opinion

Dippold v. F. B. Canada Lumber Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 19, 1926No. 25,623PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtQuinn, J.

Certiorari to the Industrial Commission to review its record and order denying relator compensation under the Workmen’s Compensation Act, G. S. 1923, §§ 4261-4337.

Relator was 42 years of age, well accustomed to hard manual labor, and of good health on September 16, 1924. He was in the employ of the respondent, F. B. Canada Lumber Company. He had been in the employ of that company for a number of years, engaged a large portion of the time in piling and loading bolts and cants. The cants which he was called upon to handle consisted of squared logs, about 6 feet in length and from 4 to 7 inches…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Walker v. Minnesota Steel Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  2. Babich v. Oliver Iron Mining Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
  3. Klika v. Independent School District No. 79Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  4. Frederickson v. Burns Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  5. Wilkins v. Ben's Home Oil Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1926

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Clark v. Banner Grain Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
  2. Bauman v. Roth Downs Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  3. Brajan v. Oliver Iron Mining Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  4. Taddi v. Village of HibbingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API