Legal Opinion
Bauman v. Roth Downs Manufacturing Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided March 28, 1929No. 27,268PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWilson, C. J.
Certiorari to the industrial commission to review its order denying compensation to the relator.
Relator is a shop foreman for Roth Downs Manufacturing Company and as such was a general shop supervisor. With four or five other men, he took part in pulling a 650-pound box of freight on a smooth floor. He states:
“I was in the front end pulling, I felt kind of a pain in my side and did not think nothing of it. * * * I said: ‘Wait a minute, I have got a pain in my side,’ and I rubbed it. * * * I noticed that pain and naturally we all stopped. * * * That night I noticed there was kind of a pain and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- O'Leary v. WangensteenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
- Walker v. Minnesota Steel Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
- Klika v. Independent School District No. 79Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- Frederickson v. Burns Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- Zobitz v. Oliver Iron Mining Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Stanton v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
- Pearson v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
- Brajan v. Oliver Iron Mining Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
- Blair v. Village of ColeraineSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
- First National Bank v. Van De PutteSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.