Legal Opinion

Rafferty v. Hartman Walsh Painting Co.

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided October 19, 2000No. 196, 1999PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARTNETT, Retired Justice:

In this appeal we consider whether the wife of a deceased employee may bring a tort action against the employer of her husband, a painter who fell to his death while painting a bridge. We find that because of the exclusivity provisions of the Delaware Workers’ Compensation Act, a tort action may not be maintained against the employer on behalf of the employee in the absence of facts being alleged which, if true, show an intention by the employer to injure the employee.

I

This is an interlocutory appeal from the order of the Superior Court dismissing the tort claims by…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Kofron v. Amoco Chemicals Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1982
  2. Keys v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1975
  3. Acevedo v. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  4. Frank C. Sparks Co. v. Huber Baking Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1953
  5. Nutt v. A.C. & S., Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Deuley v. DynCorp International, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2010
  2. Ramsey v. Georgia Southern University Advanced Development CtrSupreme Court of Delaware · 2018
  3. Owens v. Connections Community Support Programs, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2012
  4. Robles v. Hovensa, L.L.C.Supreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2008
  5. Grabowski v. ManglerSupreme Court of Delaware · 2007

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API