Frank C. Sparks Co. v. Huber Baking Co.
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
Wolcott, J.,
delivering the opinion of the Court:
The principal question for decision is whether an employer, or the employer’s insurance carrier which has paid compensation under the Workmen’s Compensation Law is subrogated to the rights of an injured employee who has elected to take compensation under the Workmen’s Compensation Law, 19 Del. C. § 2101 et seq.
The facts are briefly as follows:
In the fall of 1948, Frank C. Sparks Company (hereafter referred to as “Sparks”) contracted with Huber Baking Company (hereafter referred to as “Huber”) to construct a cement second floor in a proposed…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Engl v. ætna Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
- Jones v. Waterman SS CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1946
- Gifford v. Travelers Protective Ass'n of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1946
- Crab Orchard Improvement Co. v. Chesapeake & O. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1940
- The Federal No. 2Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1927
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Histed v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1993
- Battista v. Chrysler Corp.Superior Court of Delaware · 1982
- Messick v. Star EnterpriseSupreme Court of Delaware · 1995
- State v. CephasSupreme Court of Delaware · 1994
- Lexington Insurance v. RaboinSuperior Court of Delaware · 1998
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.