Legal Opinion
Stanley Gudyka Sales Co. v. Lacy Forest Products Co.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided May 2, 1988No. 84 C 5165PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SHADUR, District Judge.
Stanley Gudyka Sales Co., Inc. (“Gudyka”) has sued Lacy Forest Products Company (“Lacy”) and its partners 1 for breach of contract. After extended discovery during the well over three years’ pendency of this action, 2 and after this Court had received the Final Pretrial Order (“FPTO”) jointly prepared by the litigants, 3 Gudyka was given leave to file a Third Amended Complaint adding two new theories of recovery. 4
Lacy has now moved for judgment under Fed.R.Civ.P. (“Rule”) 56 on both new theories and, predictably, for sanctions under Rule 11.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- In re TCI Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- DeValk Lincoln Mercury, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- First Commodity Traders, Inc. v. Heinold Commodities, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- Brown v. Federation of State Medical BoardsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Singer v. Bulk Petroleum Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1998
- Chapman Associates General Business, Inc. v. JustakDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1990