State Ex Rel. Department of Transportation v. Barsy
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Respondents/cross-appellants assert that Justice Young has shown express or implied bias against Kermitt Waters, the attorney for respondents/cross-appellants, and that this is sufficient to disqualify him from hearing these cases. The basis of the claim is that Waters donated heavily to Justice Young’s opponent in Justice Young’s 1996 re-election campaign and that Justice Young commented that Waters’ donations may have exceeded the campaign donation limits. This same argument was made and rejected in Las Vegas Downtown Redev. Agency v. Hecht, 113 Nev. 632, 940 P.2d 127 (1997), and…
3Cases cited3 opinions
- Aetna Life Insurance v. LavoieSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Ainsworth v. Combined Insurance Co. of AmericaNevada Supreme Court · 1989
- City of Las Vegas Downtown Redevelopment Agency v. HechtNevada Supreme Court · 1997
4Cited by9 opinions
- Ges, Inc. v. CorbittNevada Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. AllenWisconsin Supreme Court · 2010
- O'BRIEN v. State Bar of NevadaNevada Supreme Court · 1998
- Nevius v. Warden, Nevada State PrisonNevada Supreme Court · 1997
- Nevius v. WardenNevada Supreme Court · 1998
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.