Legal Opinion

Nevius v. Warden, Nevada State Prison

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided August 28, 1997No. 29027, 29028PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Petitioner/appellant Thomas Nevius claims that Justice Cliff Young is disqualified in these cases because: (1) the Attorney General, whose office represents the State, endorsed and publicly supported Justice Young in his successful 1996 re-election campaign, and (2) Justice Young stated that he upheld the death penalty seventy-six times while on the Court. The first ground for disqualification was made and rejected in State, Dep’t of Transp. v. Barsy, 113 Nev. 709, 941 P.2d 969 (1997), and that decision is dispositive of this ground for disqualification.

During the 1996 election,…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Aetna Life Insurance v. LavoieSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. City of Las Vegas Downtown Redevelopment Agency v. HechtNevada Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State Ex Rel. Department of Transportation v. BarsyNevada Supreme Court · 1997

4Cited by5 opinions

  1. McConnell v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Thomas Nevius v. E.K. McDaniel Warden, OrderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  3. Nevius v. WardenNevada Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Nevius v. WardenNevada Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Nevius v. Warden, Nevada State PrisonNevada Supreme Court · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API