Legal Opinion
In re Folding Carton Antitrust Litigation
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided December 4, 1980No. Civil Action No. 76 C 1026; MDL No. 250PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PRETRIAL ORDER NO. 80
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
ROBSON and WILL, Senior District Judges.
In 1976, approximately eighty civil antitrust treble damage actions alleging a price-fixing conspiracy by sellers in the folding carton industry were consolidated in this Court by order of the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation. In July 1977, we certified a class consisting of “[a]ll persons in the United States (excluding defendants, their subsidiaries, affiliates, or agents), who purchased folding cartons from any of the defendants in these actions during the period from January 1, 1960 to December 31,…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Illinois Brick Co. v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- East Texas Motor Freight System, Inc. v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Hanover Shoe, Inc. v. United Shoe MacHinery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Bogosian v. Gulf Oil Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Rohlfing v. Manor Care, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1997
- Federal Trade Commission v. Mylan Laboratories, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 1999
- Hewlett v. Premier Salons International, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1997
- Perry v. Hartz Mountain Corp.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 1982
- Antoine L. Garabet, M.D., Inc. v. Autonomous Technologies Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2000
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.