Legal Opinion
Perry v. Hartz Mountain Corp.
District Court, S.D. Indiana
Decided April 28, 1982No. IP 81-631-CPublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ENTRY
DILLIN, District Judge.
This case is before the Court on the motion to dismiss of the defendant, Hartz Mountain Corporation (Hartz). For the reasons stated below, the motion is granted in part and denied in part.
Facts
The plaintiff, Vaughn E. Perry, Jr., was employed by Hartz from September 1975 to June 14, 1979, when he was discharged. Perry accuses Hartz of certain anticom¡)etitive practices. He alleges that his dismissal was in retaliation for his refusal to continue his participation in those practices and deliver evidence of them to Hartz. Hartz contends that Perry was fired because…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Illinois Brick Co. v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Frampton v. Central Indiana Gas CompanyIndiana Supreme Court · 1973
- Berni v. LeonardSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Karseal Corporation v. Richfield Oil CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
- Photovest Corporation, an Indiana Corporation, and Cross-Appellant v. Fotomat Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, and Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Scott Buethe v. Britt Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- Niblo v. Parr Manufacturing, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1989
- Cagle v. Burns and Roe, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1986
- Hamblen v. Danners, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1985
- Moffett v. Gene B. Glick Co., Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1985
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.