People v. Kissel
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
PRESIDING JUSTICE NASH
delivered the opinion of the court:
In these consolidated cases the State has appealed contending that the trial judges erred in finding that the implied-consent statute may not be applied to persons who have been arrested for driving while under the influence of intoxicating liquor on private property.
Defendants Robert Doody and James Slezak have not responded with briefs in this court, and we will consider the issues under the standards of First Capitol Mortgage Corp. v. Talandis Construction Corp. (1976), 63 Ill. 2d 128, 345 N.E.2d 493, and the brief filed by defendant…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- First Capitol Mortgage Corp. v. Talandis Construction Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1976
- People v. GuynnAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975
- People v. PettitIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
- People v. JensenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
- People v. FryeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- People v. WingrenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
- People v. BrownAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
- Lunceford v. City of NorthportCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1988
- People v. AyresAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
- People v. DexterAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.