Legal Opinion

People v. Ayres

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 30, 1992No. 3—91—0450, 3—91—0537 consPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McCUSKEY

The defendants, Robert Ayres and Robert Brockett, were charged with driving under the influence of alcohol (DUI) (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1989, ch. 951/2, par. 11 — 501). Both defendants took breathalyzer tests and thereafter filed motions to suppress the test results in their separate DUI proceedings. The trial court granted the motions, finding in each case that the defendant’s consent to the breathalyzer test was involuntary. The State appeals both cases. This court ordered the consolidation of these appeals because they raise a common claim. We now reverse the trial court’s suppression orders.

Both…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. People v. ToddIllinois Supreme Court · 1975
  3. People v. KisselAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
  4. People v. ByrdAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  5. People v. GiereAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. People v. JonesIllinois Supreme Court · 2005
  2. People v. GarriottAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  3. Michael Seiser v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
  4. People v. CoffinAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
  5. People v. LukachAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API