Lunceford v. City of Northport
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
Rodney Joe Lunceford was convicted of driving under the influence of alcohol. He raises two issues on this appeal from that conviction.
I
The defendant argues that the results of a breath test for intoxication should not have been admitted into evidence because he was not driving on a "public highway."
The defendant was observed sitting in an automobile parked behind a drug store in a shopping center. This was a private parking lot and not a public highway.
The offense of driving under the influence (DUI) as defined by Alabama Code 1975, § 32-5A-191, applies "upon highways andelsewhere throughout…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Bumper v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Ex Parte CollinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1980
- Gilmore v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1892
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- State v. JohnsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2000
- Ex Parte MayoSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994
- Ruffin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1991
- Pruitt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2003
- Barnett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1995
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.