Hog Slat, Inc. v. Ebert
District Court, N.D. Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
BENNETT, Chief Judge.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
/. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND.1114
II.SUMMARY JUDGMENT STANDARD.1115
III.LEGAL ANALYSIS.1115
1. Does a genuine issue of material fact exist as to whether Ebert intended to receive any income and profits from hogs finished in the hog ñnishing barn pursuant to the Hormel contract?.1116
2. Is Ebert’s counterclaim for lost income and profits prohibited under the “new business rule” because it is too remote and speculative?... .1119
3. Does Ebert’s counterclaim for lost income…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Phil Quick v. Donaldson Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
- Hartnagel v. NormanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Richards v. Farner-Bocken Co.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 2001
- Clay v. Lafarge North AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 2013