Legal Opinion · Dissent

Banks v. Mercy Villa Care Center

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 1987No. 85-817Published

1DissentCaporale, J.

I must respectfully dissent, for the majority, in my view, has stretched the meaning of being engaged in interstate commerce further than congressional direction, judicial precedent, or disciplined thought permits. The majority comes to the novel conclusion that people themselves can be articles of commerce, when they come from elsewhere to live in Nebraska on a permanent basis.

While it is true that the Fair Labor Standards Act is to be construed liberally, Tony & Susan Alamo Foundation v. Sec’y of Labor, 471 U.S. 290, 105 S. Ct. 1953, 85 L. Ed. 2d 278 (1985), it must nonetheless be applied…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Tony and Susan Alamo Foundation v. Secretary of LaborSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Warren-Bradshaw Drilling Co. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. Peter J. Brennan, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Plaza Shoe Store, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
  5. John T. Dunlop, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Mitchell N. AshyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API