Legal Opinion
K & R Engineering Co. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided February 20, 1980No. 84-77PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFriedman, Chief Judge
The plaintiff in this action seeks to recover $132,000 in damages for the alleged breach of a contract terminated by the government for its convenience. The government has *343moved for summary judgment on (1) its affirmative defense that an unlawful arrangement between the plaintiff and one of the government’s agents rendered the contract unenforceable against the government, and (2) its two counterclaims for the amounts the government previously paid under this and other contracts tainted by the same illegal arrangement.1 We heard oral argument, in which the plaintiff did not participate. We…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United States v. Mississippi Valley Generating Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- S. T. Grand, Inc. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
- United States v. Acme Process Equipment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Pan American Petroleum & Transport Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Crocker v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- The United States v. Amdahl CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- Joseph Morton Co., Inc., Appellant/cross-Appellee v. The United States, Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Long Island Savings Bank, FSB v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
- Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
- United States v. Paul G. GormanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.