Legal Opinion

Scherf v. Myers

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 31, 1977No. 11665 and 11706PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDunn, Chief Justice

(on reassignment).

Defendant has appealed from a judgment entered against him following a court trial on plaintiff’s action based upon an alleged conversion of certain guardianship funds. We affirm as to liability but reverse as to damages.

At the outset, we are faced with plaintiff’s contention that because defendant failed to submit proposed findings of fact he is precluded from asking for a review of the sufficiency of the evidence to support the judgment. Moody County v. Cable, 82 S.D. 537, 150 N.W.2d 193; In re Appeals of Bottcher, 78 S.D. 360, 102 N.W.2d 623. In view of the defendant’s…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Jones v. Strom Construction Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Oahe Enterprises, Incorporated v. GoldenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Moody County v. CableSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Rapid Sewing Center, Inc. v. SandersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Richstein v. RoeschSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1946

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Field v. MansSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Ward v. LangeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Heritage v. Pioneer Brokerage & Sales, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Burr v. LichtenheimSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  5. Rushmore State Bank v. Kurylas, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1988

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API