Johnson v. State

GOLDEN, Justice.

Appellant, Arthur George Johnson (Johnson), claims the district court erroneously admitted hearsay statements pursuant to *360Wyo.R.Evid. 804(b)(3) and 804(b)(6) during his criminal trial. The hearsay statements were made by Ronnie Langley (Langley), a codefendant, during Langley’s sentencing hearing, which preceded Johnson’s trial. Later, Langley invoked his Fifth Amendment right not to incriminate himself and was unavailable to testify at Johnson’s trial.

We affirm.

ISSUES

Appellant Johnson presents the issues as:

I. Did the trial court err when it allowed the introduction of…