Legal Opinion

United States v. Cyprus Amax Minerals Co.

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided March 31, 1997No. 3:92-cv-00290PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RULING ON RENEWED CROSS-MOTIONS FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

EGINTON, Senior District Judge.

Plaintiff, United States of America, brought this action pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 7405 against defendant, Cyprus Amax Minerals Company, to recover excise tax refunds paid on underground and surface coal sold from defendant’s Indiana, Illinois, Utah and Wyoming mines during the years 1983 through 1985.

The parties cross-moved for partial summary judgment with respect to the excise tax paid during the years 1983 through 1985 on surface coal mined at defendant’s Belle Ayr and Eagle Butte, Wyoming, mines. In…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Carole Tomka v. The Seiler Corporation, Daniel Lucey, David Polonsky and Timothy ConroyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
  2. Reves v. Ernst & YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. The United States of America v. The Russell Manufacturing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
  4. Stock Equipment Company, a Unit of General Signal Corporation v. Tennessee Valley AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
  5. A.J. Taft Coal Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Amax Coal Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
  2. United States v. MacPhailDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API