Legal Opinion

United States v. MacPhail

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided February 25, 2004No. C2-00-621Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

HOLSCHUH, District Judge.

Plaintiff United States of America asserts a cause of action under 26 U.S.C. § 7405(b) seeking recovery from Defendant Angus MacPhail of an income tax overpayment refund. This matter is currently before the Court on Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment on this claim against Defendant MacPhail. (Docket No. 45). For the reasons below, the Court hereby grants Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment against Defendant Mac-Phail.

I. Background

Initially, Plaintiff asserted claims against both Defendant MacPhail and Sarah Crane for recovery of an erroneous…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API