Legal Opinion

State v. . Dalton

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 2, 1934PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.

Upon bis arraignment tbe prisoner moved to quash the indictment on the ground of illegality in the organization of the grand jury, and excepted to the court’s denial of his motion.

By an act ratified on 18 March, 1931, section 2334 of the Consolidated Statutes was made applicable to Henderson County. Public Laws, 1931, chap. 131. It was thereby provided that at the first fall and spring-terms of the criminal courts grand juries should be drawn to serve respectively during the remaining fall and spring terms — that is, for a term of six months. A panel was to be drawn from the jury box at least…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. . BanksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  2. Holcomb v. . HolcombSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  3. State v. . ScruggsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
  4. State v. . SheltonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1855
  5. State v. . WallaceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. State v. BindykeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  2. Commonwealth v. FugmannSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  3. Robinson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1944
  4. Commonwealth v. BellinoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
  5. State v. . EmerySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API